Monday, March 7, 2011

Statement on gambling in Kelantan


Mustafa Ali

Statement by PAS secretary-general on the plan to ban gambling activities by the Kelantan state government.


We refer to the action taken by the Kelantan state government against premises running gambling activities and the reactions from DAP chairman Karpal Singh and others.


I would like to inform that it has always been the state government’s policy for the past 20 years to oppose any form of gambling.


This issue must be seen in its entirety and against a backdrop of the gambling scourge which goes beyond Muslim, non-Muslim, Malay or non-Malay communities.


Gambling's negative impact on society is public knowledge and as such it is reviled by all religions as its goes against family, society and country.


As the issue has to do with principle and policy, we plan to bring this matter to the top Pakatan Rakyat leadership for a serious discussion to find an amicable solution.


We are aware of UMNO and BN's eagerness to legalise gambling by having the Federal government issue gambling licences.


We hope Pakatan Rakyat will take a serious and different approach.


Mustafa Ali
PAS Secretary-General,
6 March 2011


http://en.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2399:statement-on-gambling-in-kelantan&catid=53:press-unedited&Itemid=127

What the Bible says about gambling


David E. Pratte

Gambling or "gaming" for stakes is becoming increasingly popular. A person can bet by lottery, casino, poker, slot machines, raffles, office pools, sports wagers, or online betting. But does God view it as moral or immoral? Should a Christian gamble? What does the Bible say? What about gambling addiction?

Gambling is big business. Consider the following facts:
* Nearly all states in the US allow some form of legalized "gaming." Many allow legal casinos and even more have a lottery. In addition, much gambling is still illegal.
* Americans gamble more money each year than they spend on groceries!
* In Mississippi more money is spent on betting than on all retail sales combined.
* 85% of young people have already become gamblers.
* Usually the people who gamble the most are the people who can afford it the least: the poor and the elderly.
[All statistics cited are from Dr. James Dobson, who served on the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, whose report was issued in 1999.]

The purpose of this study is to consider whether or not gambling is morally acceptable. We hope to discuss what constitutes gambling and what the teaching of Jesus Christ says regarding its moral significance. Since the Bible is the highest moral standard ever known, and since it reveals the will of the God who created us all, we will appeal to it as the supreme standard (2 Tim. 3:16,17; 1 Cor. 14:37; John 17:17; Matt. 7:21-27).

In this study "gambling" refers to a wager or bet in which each player agrees to risk losing some material possession to other players in exchange for the chance to win the possessions of other players without compensation to the loser, the winner(s) and loser(s) being determined by the outcome of a game.

Please note four essential elements of gambling in this definition:

1. A game of chance or skill - any event of uncertain outcome.
This may be a game the gamblers play among themselves or may be some event that would have occurred anyway (such as the outcome of an election or sports event).

2. The stakes
Each player places at risk some possession of material value.

3. The agreement (wager or bet)
Before the game each player agrees to risk losing his possession in exchange for the opportunity to take the possessions of others, depending on the outcome of the game.

4. Lack of fair compensation
No goods or services of fair value are given in exchange for what is lost. The loser will give up his possessions without being recompensed, and the winner will gain possessions without repaying the loser.

Activities That Are Not Gambling

People sometimes confuse the issue by claiming that certain acts are gambling, even though some essential elements of gambling are missing.

Crossing the street, driving a car
Some people say, "Everything in life involves a gamble." This confuses risk with gambling. Not all risks involve gambling. These acts involve no wager and no stakes. There is no agreement to try to take someone else's possessions.

Games without stakes or bets
The same games, on which people sometimes bet, can be played simply for fun with no possessions put at risk. This too is not gambling.

Farming, owning a business, etc.
Some say this is gambling because one risks losing money. But again there is no wager, but there is compensation. There is no agreement to take other people's property without compensation. The intent is to produce goods or services of benefit to others in exchange for that which benefits us. This is expressly authorized in Scripture.

Investing in stock
Some say this is gambling, but what is stock? Stock is a means for people to become part owners of a company. Buying stock is no more inherently gambling than is ownership of any other business. The intent is to make a profit by producing something of benefit to customers. Investors receive their share of these profits in the form of dividends or increases in the value of the stock.

Further, when stock is sold, both buyer and seller agree on the price. There is no wager - no prior agreement to risk loss at another's expense. If either thinks the price is unfair, they refuse to deal. (It may be possible to gamble or otherwise sin in the stock market, but buying stock does not inherently constitute gambling.)

Buying insurance
Some think insurance is gambling. But again, there is no wager and there is compensation. No one agrees to gain at the expense of someone else's loss. On the contrary, the whole purpose of insurance is to compensate the insured if he does have a loss (such as death, car wreck, hospitalization, etc.). If no such loss occurs, the customer has purchased the peace of mind of knowing he would have been compensated if he had experienced a loss. Regardless of whether or not this is a wise investment, the point here is that it is not gambling.

In short, none of these examples constitute gambling, since no one necessarily wants uncompensated losses to occur. But the gambler always wants financial loss to occur, because he hopes to profit from those losses.

Activities That Are Gambling

In the following examples, all the elements of gambling are present.

* Casino gambling: slot machines, roulette wheels, dice and card games, numbers games, etc., played for stakes.
* Racetrack betting on horses, dogs.
* Lotteries.

* Charity and church-sponsored bingo, raffles, etc. If someone says, "It's for a good cause," then just make a donation and skip the gambling!
* Bazaar and fair booths where you pay to spin a wheel and try to win a prize, etc.
* Amateur gambling including poker games for money, office pools, matching quarters for cokes or coffee, playing marbles for keeps. Also included are some athletic leagues where winners are not just awarded a trophy or plaque, but players put money into a "kitty" then play to try to win some of the money.

Even if small amounts of money are involved, such activities still violate Bible principles. Further, they establish a precedent that makes it impossible for one to consistently object to other people's gambling. Where do you draw the line and say, "This much money risked is all right, but any more is immoral?"

Objections to Gambling

The word "gamble" is not found in the Bible, yet the practice violates Bible principles regardless of the amount of money involved.

Rules for Transfer of Property

The Bible authorizes only three morally legitimate ways for money or possessions to pass from one owner to another. Gambling fits none of them.

1. The law of labor ("the work ethic")
One may be paid as compensation for work done to produce goods or services that benefit other people. Scripture strongly teaches this "work ethic."

1 Timothy 5:18 - The laborer is worthy of his wages. [Luke 10:7]

Ephesians 4:28 - Do not steal but labor at good (beneficial) work.

1 Thessalonians 4:11,12 - To meet our needs, we should do our own business and work for an income (not take what other people earned). [Matt. 20:1-15; James 5:4]

2 Thessalonians 3:10-12 - Like Paul, people should work so they can eat their own bread (not other people's bread). If they will not work, they should not eat.

We must not try to live off the labors of others. We can expect goods or services from others only as compensation for work we do that produces something of benefit (that which is good - Eph. 4:28). Gambling undermines the Biblical work ethic because, instead of accomplishing productive labor that benefits others, the gambler seeks to get something for nothing by taking what other people have earned.

If someone claims that gamblers must work to win, we respond that this is not the labor described in these verses, because it produces nothing of benefit to others. Instead it attempts to take what others have, without compensating them. A thief also must do some labor; but such "work" is forbidden because it is harmful to others, not beneficial. If gambling were Scriptural labor, then all gamblers should be paid because all are laboring to win.

Someone may argue, "Gamblers are just paying for a form of entertainment." However, in legitimate entertainment the entertainers are paid a predetermined fee for providing a service to others. But gamblers are all providing the same "service" for one another; so if gambling were legitimate entertainment, then all participants should be paid or all should pay. The gambler does not want the other players to profit; he wants to profit at their expense! This violates the principle that the laborer is worthy of his hire.

Gambling undermines the work ethic and leads people to seek to profit by causing loss to others.

(Other scriptures are: 1 Cor. 9:7-10; Gen. 3:17-19; Prov. 31:24; Acts 18:3.)

2. The law of exchange
A person may simply agree to exchange possessions (goods or money) with someone else. Each party is paid or fairly compensated by receiving possessions of fair value in return for what he gives up. Bible examples are:

Genesis 23:1-18 - Abraham bought a field and a cave for money.

Matthew 13:45,46 - A merchant sold possessions to buy a pearl.

John 4:8 - Disciples bought food.

Note that, in a fair transaction, both parties receive what they view as fair value compared to what they give up. Neither party should attempt to take other people's property without giving fair value in exchange. But again gambling does not fit here, because the winner has no intention to compensate the loser. In fact, each gambler hopes other people will lose so he can take their property, while at the same time he hopes no one will take his property. This violates the law of exchange.

(Other passages: Gen. 33:19; Prov. 31:16; Acts 4:34,37.)

3. The law of giving
A person may knowingly choose, of his own free will, to unconditionally give something away as an expression of good will or kindness, with no obligation for the receiver to offer any compensation in return. Bible examples are:

Ephesians 4:28 - One who has earned goods by his own labor may choose to give to others in need.

2 Corinthians 9:6,7 - We should give willingly and cheerfully, not grudgingly. Note: If gambling fits this, then we should all gamble bountifully!

Acts 20:35 - It is more blessed to give than to receive. Do gamblers consider giving to be more blessed than receiving?

1 John 3:17,18; 1 Corinthians 13:3 - Giving must be motivated by love, compassion, and desire to help others. Is this what motivates gamblers? No, they agree to give (if they lose) only because they want to win what others possess!

Again, gambling does not fit this category because gamblers do not give willingly, freely, as an act of love or compassion.

(Other passages: Matt. 19:21; 25:35; 2:11; Acts 2:45; 4:34,35)

God authorizes three legitimate ways for people to obtain property from others. Gambling not only does not fit any of them, but it clearly contradicts and undermines them. Hence, it is a morally illegitimate way of obtaining others' possessions. If it does not fit these categories, then what category does it fit? Consider the next point.

Covetousness and Greed

The Bible repeatedly warns against greed and covetousness.
Ephesians 5:5-7; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 - Those who covet will not receive the kingdom of God, but God's wrath abides on them.

Romans 1:29-32 - They are worthy of death, and so are those who approve or encourage their conduct.

1 Corinthians 5:11 - Church members who practice it should be disciplined.

(See also Deut. 5:21; Mark 7:20-23; 1 Tim. 6:6-10; 2 Tim. 3:2; Prov. 1:19; 21:26; 15:27; Heb. 13:5.)

What is covetousness and greed?
In general covetousness is the desire to wrongfully take someone else's property. It is "a desire for the increasing of one's substance by appropriating that of others" (Baker's Dictionary of Theology). So a person is covetous if he wants to take other people's property in a way not authorized by God.

Note some Bible passages:

Acts 20:33-35 - Paul did not covet other people's property but was willing to work to earn what he needed. So covetousness contrasts with the legitimate means for obtaining the property of others. Clearly gambling fits the definition of covetousness.

2 Corinthians 9:5-7 - If a person is compelled to give property against his will ("grudgingly or of necessity"), instead of cheerfully out of generosity, this is here called "covetousness" (v5 - KJV). A legitimate gift involves willingly choosing to give as a gesture of good will and kindness.

If we seek to take someone else's property which he really does not want to give, while at the same time we seek to avoid giving him fair compensation in return, that would be covetousness. Yet this is exactly what gambling involves.

Efforts to rationalize gambling

Someone may say, "Gamblers agree to pay up if they lose, so they do give it willingly." But it is not done in the spirit of good will that the Bible describes, else why does the gambler try to keep others from taking his possessions?

The truth is, gambling is mutual covetousness like dueling is mutual attempted murder. In dueling, each person agrees to let the other person try to kill him in exchange for the opportunity to try to kill the other person. But killing would still be unauthorized regardless of the agreement (Romans 13:8-10). So a gambler agrees to let others try to take his possessions in exchange for the opportunity for him to try to take the other person's possessions. And it is still covetousness, just like dueling is still attempted murder. The agreement simply makes both parties guilty of sin!

Someone else may say, "It's just a friendly game. We don't really care whether we win or lose the money." A professional gambler once told me that people gamble, not to make money, but for the thrill, the high, the excitement.

Have these folks been listening to the advertisements? The people who provide the gambling know that people do care about the money, and that's the way they advertise it.

If people don't gamble for the money, why not leave the money out of it and just play for fun? If you say, "the money makes it more exciting," then I ask why so, if you don't care about the money! The only possible reason why the money makes it more exciting, is that gamblers do care about the money! So the money does matter, and therefore gambling really is covetousness.

When a person wants to take someone else's property that they really don't want to give and without returning fair value in exchange, that person is guilty of covetousness. And that is exactly what the gambler does.

The Principle of Stewardship

We are stewards of possessions that belong to God.

1 Peter 4:10,11 - We are stewards of God's manifold blessings and should use these blessings to glorify God "in all things." A steward is a servant who has been entrusted to use his master's property to achieve the master's purposes. The master will judge the steward for how well he used the property. [Luke 12:42-46; 2 Chron. 28:1; 1 Cor. 4:1,2]

Psalm 24:1,2; 50:10-12 - Material property is part of our stewardship in that God ultimately owns all physical things but has entrusted them to us.

1 Timothy 6:9,10,17-19 - Instead of being greedy and loving physical things, we should use them to accomplish God's purposes. This includes providing for the needs of ourselves and our families, giving to the church, preaching the gospel, and helping the needy. Our material possessions are not ours to use as we please. We must use them to do God's will and then give account to Him for our use of them.

[Haggai 2:8; 1 Chron. 29:11-14; Acts 4:32-35; 1 John 2:15-17; Deut. 10:14]

The gambler is an unfaithful steward.

Luke 16:1,2 - Instead of using the Master's possessions for the intended purpose, the unfaithful steward wastes them or risks losing them for selfish purposes. This is exactly what the gambler does. [Matthew 25:14-30]

To illustrate, suppose you give some money to a friend for safekeeping. But then, without your permission, he uses your money as his stakes for gambling. Whether he won or lost, would you not confront him for misusing your money? For his own self-indulgence he risked losing what belonged to you.

But every gambler gambles with money that belongs to God without His permission. He wastes his master's substance and risks losing it in unauthorized activities for his own selfishness. God will hold him accountable.

The Law of Love

Matthew 22:39 - The second greatest command is "love your neighbor as yourself." Does the gambler love his neighbor as he loves himself?

Luke 6:27; 1 John 3:16-18 - Loves leads us to do good, not harm, even to our enemies. Note that coveting violates the law of love because it does harm our neighbor (Romans 13:8-10). Love does not seek to profit by taking what belongs to others against their will and without compensation. But the very essence of gambling is hoping other people will lose, so you can profit at their loss.

Matthew 7:12 - Do to others as you want them to do to you. Does the gambler want the other players to take his possessions? No! Then he must not try to take theirs! By definition, gambling violates the law of love because a gambler tries to do to others what he does not want them to do to him.

1 Corinthians 13:5 - Love seeketh not its own.

Philippians 2:4 - We should seek, not just our own interests, but the interests of others. Gambling, by its nature, is selfish and self-seeking. The gambler seeks personal gain and profit by taking other people's possessions without requiting them. Such is completely contrary to love.

A Root of Evil

A Bible principle

1 Timothy 6:9,10 - Love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Greed leads to many foolish and hurtful lusts, many sorrows, etc. If gambling is greed, as we have claimed, then we should expect to find it associated with all kinds of sin and immorality.

Matthew 7:16-19 - A tree is known by its fruits. A corrupt tree will surely produce corrupt fruits. If so, it should be destroyed (v19). Hence, if gambling produces many forms of evil, this will confirm our conclusion that gambling is evil of itself.

The fruits caused by and associated with gambling: Poverty, neglect of families, quarreling, and divorce because gamblers often gamble with money the family needs.

One out of every five homeless people admit that gambling contributed to their poverty. Among the states Nevada, long known for gambling, has the highest rate of divorce and the highest rate of high school dropouts. Even casino owner Donald Trump admitted: "People will spend a tremendous amount of money in casinos, money that they would normally spend on buying a refrigerator or a new car."

And interestingly, about one third of all millionaire lottery winners end up in poverty again afterward!

Anger, hatred, and even murder directed by the losers against the winners, especially if the losers think they have been cheated.

Drinking and drugs, alcoholism and addiction. These always abound where gambling occurs. Gamblers who lose seek to drown their sorrow and guilt. One tenth of all southern Nevadans are alcoholics.

Lying because gamblers seek to hide their habit and their losses.

Crime - Much gambling is illegal. Gambling of all kinds attracts criminal types and is often sponsored by organized crime syndicates. Gamblers often deal drugs, embezzle, or steal to get money to gamble or to pay gambling debts.

Influence on government - Why don't lawmakers outlaw gambling? It provides government money without raising taxes. But more importantly, the overwhelming majority of both Republicans and Democrats receive major campaign contributions from gambling interests.

Prostitution, lasciviousness, and general sexual immorality because of the immoral entertainment provided in gambling houses, and because many women use these means to get money to gamble or to pay gambling debts. The Las Vegas Yellow Pages list 136 pages of advertisements relating to prostitution.

Suicide as an escape from compulsive gambling or from huge losses. Nevada is first in the nation in suicides.

Truly, "by their fruits ye shall know them," and "the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil."

Temptation and Evil Influence

Like drinkers and drug abusers, gamblers begin by thinking they can avoid the dangers involved. But participation lures them in deeper and subjects them to the moral dangers associated with gambling. Is it worth the risk?

Note some passages that warn us to avoid taking such risks for the sake of our own self-indulgence.

1 Timothy 6:9 - Those who love money (v10) and are minded to be rich fall into temptation, a snare, and many foolish and hurtful lusts. Surely no one can deny that temptation is associated with gambling.

Matthew 6:13; 26:41 - We should pray to avoid evil and temptation. Watch and pray lest you enter into temptation. Is it right to pray to avoid temptation and then deliberately subject ourselves to it, simply for the sake of passing pleasure? Note James 4:3; Matthew 18:6-9.

1 Corinthians 15:33 - Evil companions corrupt good morals. Yet all gambling puts us in the company of evil men and tempts us to participate in other sins.

Proverbs 13:20 - Keeping company with wise men will make us wise, but associating with morally and spiritually foolish people will cause us to suffer. [24:1,2]

Surely the gambler is running with the wrong crowd, subjecting himself to temptation exactly like these passages forbid. Many people will be lost eternally because of gambling's influence. Why submit ourselves to the danger?

Example and Influence

Gamblers not only sin and tempt themselves to sin, they also tempt others to sin.

Consider these passages:

1 Timothy 4:12 - Set a good example in word, manner of life, love, faith, and purity. Does the gambler set this kind of example?

Matthew 5:13-16 - Our lives should be like a light so others may see our good works and glorify God. Who will glorify God from seeing you gamble?

Matthew 18:6,7 - Woe to one who tempts others to sin. It is better to be drowned than to be guilty of this.

Whom does the gambler tempt to sin?

Young people - As with smoking, drinking, and drug abuse, most gamblers start young because of the influence of others: friends, relatives, older people they respect. If you gamble, your example may lead some young person to start or continue gambling.

He may then become trapped in the sins involved in and associated with gambling. If so, you will also be held responsible for his fate. Do you want this on your conscience?

Reformed compulsive gamblers - As with alcoholics and drug addicts, when a compulsive gambler quits, he must never again return to the practice or he immediately becomes an addict again. If he sees or knows you gamble, your example encourages him to try the practice again. If he does, he is immediately addicted again. And you are responsible.

Non-Christians - Many people who are not Christians know that gambling is very un-Christlike. If you gamble, you may never be able to lead them to hear the soul-saving gospel. Yet the Bible plainly obligates you to do all you can to help other people be saved (1 Corinthians 8-10). The gambler will never be a successful soul-saver (Prov. 11:30).

No one gambles alone. If you gamble, you must gamble with others. So every gambler has a bad influence on someone. The only way to avoid this problem is simply to avoid gambling altogether.

Conclusion

We may consider other points regarding gambling. Much gambling is illegitimate. And those who begin gambling legally often end up gambling illegally, because they become desensitized and because the odds are better. But Christians must obey civil law (Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-15).

Also, many young people gamble in violation of their parents' will (Ephesians 6:1; Romans 1:29-32). Many gamblers know that their marriage companion strongly objects. Is this the proper, loving way to treat a spouse (Ephesians 5:22-29)?

Finally, we must imitate the example of Jesus (1 Peter 2:21,22; Matthew 10:24,25; 1 Corinthians 11:1).

Can you honestly imagine Jesus playing a slot machine or roulette wheel or betting on a dice or poker game? Honestly now, does gambling harmonize with the example of Jesus and the teaching of His word?


http://en.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2398:what-the-bible-says-about-gambling&catid=46:depth&Itemid=84

What Hinduism and Buddhism say about gambling


Sources: Edmund Bergler / OnlinePokies

As with a number of areas, Islam and Hinduism are largely in alignment on the issue of gambling. Hindu scriptures prohibit gambling. These are the sections of the Hindu scriptures which mention and prohibit gambling:

“A Gamester / gambler says,‘My wife holds me aloof, my mother hates me’. The wretched man finds none to comfort him.” (Rigveda 10:34:3)

“Play not with dice: No, cultivate thy corn land. Enjoy the gain and deem that wealth sufficient”.(Rigved 10:34:13)

“Drinking, gambling, women (not lawfully wedded wives) and hunting, in that order, he should know to be the very worst four in the group of (vices) born of desire”
(Manu Smriti 7:50)

Gambling is also prohibited in several verses of the Manu Smriti including:
ii. Manu Smriti Chapter 7 Verse 47
iii.Manu Smriti Chapter 9 Verses 221-22
iv.Manu Smriti Chapter 9 Verse 258

And so it can be seen that Hinduism does not approve gambling as a lawful activity. However, in other sections of Hindu scriptures, there are suggestions that there been gambling activities carried out in Hindu culture.

Mahabharata is a famous epic story and scripture in Hinduism. In this epic there are numerous instances of gambling activities. The epic states that gambling in the form of dice games was a source of entertainment for Kings.

There are also other Hindu scriptures which indicate that gambling activities were carried out in Hindu empires. Thus the scriptures seem to be both prohibit gambling, and also acknowledge it as a religious norm. Contradictions in the scriptures are naturally not uncommon.

Buddhism

Buddhism takes a nuanced view of gambling and its prohibition. In Sigalovada Sutta’s “The Layman’s Code of Discipline” the following is stated:

“There are, young householder, these six evil consequences in indulging in gambling:
(i) the winner begets hate,
(ii) the loser grieves for lost wealth,
(iii) loss of wealth,
(iv) his word is not relied upon in a court of law,
(v) he is despised by his friends and associates,
(vi) he is not sought after for matrimony; for people would say he is a gambler and is not fit to look after a wife.”

Dighajanu Sutta, Anguttara Nikaya VIII.54 states the following about gambling from a Buddhist perspective:

“These are the four drains on one’s store of wealth: debauchery in sex; debauchery in drink; debauchery in gambling; and evil friendship, evil companionship, evil camaraderie. Just as if there were a great reservoir with four inlets and four drains, and a man were to close the inlets and open the drains, and the sky were not to pour down proper showers, the depletion of that great reservoir could be expected, not its increase. In the same way, these are the four drains on one’s store of wealth: debauchery in sex; debauchery in drink; debauchery in gambling; and evil friendship, evil companionship, evil camaraderie.

These are the four inlets to one’s store of wealth: no debauchery in sex; no debauchery in drink; no debauchery in gambling; and admirable friendship, admirable companionship, admirable camaraderie. Just as if there were a great reservoir with four inlets and four drains, and a man were to open the inlets and close the drains, and the sky were to pour down proper showers, the increase of that great reservoir could be expected, not its depletion. In the same way, these are the four inlets to one’s store of wealth: no debauchery in sex; no debauchery in drink; no debauchery in gambling; and admirable friendship, admirable companionship, admirable camaraderie.”

Thus it seems that in Buddhistm, while gambling itself is not considered inherently wrong for the layperson (monks are forbidden from gambling), if it is indulged in to the extent that is produces “evil consequences” then it is inadvisable. It should be noted however, that, as with Christianity and other religions, there are many different types of Buddhism. The above is from Theravada Buddhism, which is practised in Thailand and elsewhere in South East Asia, but there are many other forms.

Buddha: An unskillful activity

To gamble (jūtakīḷā) is to risk money on games of chance. Gambling was already an ancient activity by the Buddha’s time and the Vedas, the most ancient Hindu scriptures, contain the famous ‘Gambler’s Lament’ in which a man cries after having wagered and lost his wife and children. Such extreme betting is also mentioned in the Tipiṭaka (M.III,107).

Hardly surprisingly, the Buddha saw gambling as an unskillful activity. He said: ‘There are these six dangers of being addicted to gambling. In winning one begets hatred; in losing one mourns the loss of one’s wealth; one’s word is not accepted in court; one is avoided by both friends and officials; one is not sought after for marriage because people say a gambler cannot support a wife.’ (D.III,183). On another occasion he said that ‘squandering wealth on dice’ leads to one’s decline (Sn.106).

However, we might say that there are three types of gambling – recreational, habitual and addictive.

The first type is when someone occasionally plays cards for small stakes or buys a lottery ticket to support a charity.

Habitual gambling is to gamble a significant but manageable percentage of one’s income on a regular basis.

Addictive gambling is the inability to resist the opportunity to gamble and thus be constantly in debt.

From a Buddhist perspective, recreational gambling would be considered harmless and not against the Precepts. However, because all gambling plays on at least some element of greed, it is certainly unbecoming for Buddhist organizations to raise funds by lotteries and games of chance.

Habitual and addictive gambling are psychologically, socially and spiritually harmful because they are motivated by and reinforce delusion, avarice and the mistaken belief in good and bad ‘luck.’

For the Buddha, it is being virtuous that makes one ‘lucky,’ not having a winning streak. He said: ‘If a gambler were to win a fortune on his very first throw his luck would nonetheless be insignificant. It is many times more “lucky” to conduct oneself wisely with body, speech and mind and after death be reborn in heaven.’ (M.III,178).


http://en.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2397:what-hinduism-and-buddhism-say-about-gambling&catid=46:depth&Itemid=84

After Kerdau-Merlimau, reform or revolt?


Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad

I am fully conscious of how the BN’s mainstream media (MSM) would demonise and ostracise me for what I am about to say. I am nonetheless going to say it in simple and unequivocal term. Simply put, if I were to call the shot in N28 Kerdau by-election, I would want my party to boycott the election. Period.

The BN’s MSM would then have a field day in making PAS their punching bag and would go to town for weeks on end on this huge political meal. They would be apparently vindicated for all their claims that the opposition is bankrupt of ideas and issues to fight them on any further political contestation.

On the back of the looming 13th General Election (GE) coming ever closer, the decision to boycott would arguably be a political suicide for PAS and the Pakatan. Political analysts might argue that the opposition has finally succumbed to the psychological war of the BN’s ‘propagandist firepower’. It doesn’t take a pundit to tell you that.

That is the usual ‘in-the-box-kind-of-thinking’ that invariably ends up in political parties quite unwilling to brace drastic unconventional ideas and maneuvers. That’s the thinking that underpins the predictable decision of most political parties of whatever ideological persuasions in the face of challenging situation.

What’s my rationale for proposing this drastic action? Am I already conceding defeat on the 11th hours? Am I now perceived as mitigating the adverse impact of another PAS’ defeat? Say what you like.

I have been part of the strategic teams of many a by-election especially after the 12th GE. Some we have won and others we lost. The sweetest victory was of course Kuala Terengganu and the more bitter defeat was Galas. On both occasions power changed hands.

Kerdau's finishing line

Quite contrary to the idea of running from defeat, I have a strange feeling that Kerdau is fast making me upbeat especially towards its finishing line. I am not commenting on Merlimau as I am not aware of the realities on ‘ground-zero’ in that BN’s state of Melaka.

Let me say it again. I’m not looking for an upset in Kerdau but is seriously hoping for a reduction of the majority the BN’s candidate secured in the last GE.

I’m not being wishful but given our campaign ‘blitz’ which put the Pahang’s MB defenceless to the finishing line, this writer is hardly surprised if the voters so decide to protest against Umno/BN’s decades of malaise and negligence as to give PAS a victory.

No one in his right frame of mind would miss noticing that Kerdau is a ‘cowboy’ town. After 53 years Kerdau has never got on to be in the radar of development. It’s the PM’s home state mind you. So simply said again, I’m not running from defeat.

However, this piece is at best purely academic as far as a boycott is concerned, as polling is well underway for both Merlimau and Kerdau, before this writer could publish or upload this piece.

But I felt the compelling need to say and share it with the entire nation, before the results are announced this evening. I’m dead serious. If anything this piece and the likes of this writing, if widely enough read and disseminated, could very well be the genesis of a pending ‘national revolt’, not quite like the middle-eastern turmoil now on world stage that Najib dreaded.

'Electoral Authoritarianism’

But strangely quite alike though, as it will also represent the utter disdain and hatred of the rakyat or the citizens, for what is here now dubbed in “Political Science” as an ‘Electoral Authoritarianism’ (EA). Malaysia is now listed as one by the author of ‘The Logics of Electoral Authoritarianism”, Professor Andres Schedler (2006).

Simply defined, EA is how government abuse power as to distort and contain a true electoral competition and denies and subverts a free and fair election.

In the eyes of an enlarging enlightened sections of the Malaysian electorates and citizenry, Malaysia is indeed guilty of perpetuating ‘electoral authoritarianism’ with impunity. For that, Najib and his cohorts please take note!

If Najib truly wants to put the “Ben-Ali-Mubaarak-Gaddafi-type Revolt” at bay in our beloved land of Malaysia, act urgently to redress and reform the many excesses and sins on ‘electoral authoritarianism’ that has continued unabated for far too long in this country!

My arguments, with respect to a boycott call on Kerdau by-election, is essentially premised on, but not limited to the following basis and evidences.

1.Najib's now infamous saying, “We don’t buy votes, but if you support us we can increase your allocation tomorrow or later. But show support for Barisan Nasional first”.

Now that could only equal to his atrocious words of “You help me, I help you” in Sibu ie his promise of delivering RM5 million on Monday if Robert Lau wins on Sunday now is iconised as the ultimate of ‘vote-buying’ in the lexicology of our local EA. If that is not votebuting, what is?

2.Najib began as early as on the second day of the campaign period to blitz Kerdau with ‘goodies’ and handouts as follows: RM400,000 for a hall in Kampong Seri Kerdau, RM150,000 for a Balai Bomba, RM100,000 for Hindu Temple and RM9.25millions on a water treatment plant in Batu Sawar.
That’s a hefty RM10.4million, well exceeding the constituency budget allocation. Where are funds coming from? Umno’s coffers or cronies’ or rakyats’?

3.Abuse of usage of public premises for party political campaign listed below:
i. Public Field in Teluk Sentang,
ii. Mosques and Schools in Batu Sawar,
iii. Community Hall in Jengka 23 Felda,
iv. Broadband Centre for Jengka 25
v. Community Hall in Kuala Tekal
vi. Kerdau’s Felda’s office.

4.Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Ahmad Maslan’s announcement that the federal government will settle the CESS payment of RM13,000 for each settler in Jengka 22 next Monday is a surely a covert inducement for settlers to vote for BN come polling day for the Kerdau by-election on Sunday.

(Cess payments are monies deducted from the sale of rubber for the purpose of replanting rubber plantations with oil palm. However, when settlers made the decision to switch from rubber to oil palm in 2004, cess payments worth RM12,000 that each settler had accumulated over the course of more than 20 years were not paid by Felda. Felda had paid the settlers RM5,000 each but the Land Development Authority still owes the settlers RM13,000 each, including interest).

The bone of contention is why only pay those in the Jengka 22 in the N28 Kerdau constituency, while all Felda settlers Pahang have long been waiting for what are rightly theirs!

5.The vicious and baseless attack on Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, the Director for PAS’ Strategic Centre for the N28 Kerdau by-election by the MSM. The footage was widely covered and repeated by the BN’s TV channels including the ‘independent’ TV3.

This should be the last straw of it all. Seen and peceived by many as failing to respond to all the allegations of a failing Pahang state, as concertedly attacked by PAS’ election machinery, as depicted by Auditor General’s report, Umno took the final hours of campaign to level a smear campaign on him, accusing him of abusing and capitalizing on a Felda settler’s financial hardship to his advantage.

Courting another Bersih-style revolt

All these heinous hate campaign were fortunately clarified by those involved but wasn’t at all featured in the BN’s MSM. Abuse of MSM and denial of opposition’s right to MSM has become more rampant of late.

Based on a snap-shot of the abuses and excesses of a regime that practices “Electoral Authoritarianism”, I for one would not have hesitated to give the Election Commission an ultimatum –Respond or face a National Revolt!

For the information of all well-wishers of democracy and in all fairness to us in PAS/Pakatan, we had submitted on 2 memorandum to the EC, MACC and the PDRM to protest of all these abuses and subversion of democracy.

It does not take a lawyer to be telling you that Najib and his cohorts are abusing the provision of the Election Offences Act of 1954 aimed at curbing abuses and corrupt practices of contending parties in an electoral process.

It is the conviction of this writer that Malaysia may not well see the equivalent of the Middle Eastern upheaval soonest.

But if this regime persists and perpetuates “Electoral Authoritarianism” with little or no regards for the demands of reform by both civil society and opposition political parties, Najib is indeed courting the like of another and bigger peaceful assembly of 500,000 protestors and well-wishers of democracy prior the 13th GE.


http://en.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2393:after-kerdau-merlimau-reform-or-revolt&catid=35:columnist&Itemid=71

Pakatan yakin dapat laksana penuh Buku Jingga

Ismail Hashim

(Tan Sri Khalid bersama Exconya dan Dr Wan Azizah melancarkan Buku Jingga peringkat negeri Selangor semalam)

SHAH ALAM, 7 Mac: Menteri Besar Selangor, Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim yakin Buku Jingga dapat dilaksanakan sepenuh sebaik Pakatan Rakyat diberi kuasa memerintah negara kerana jumlah yang diperlukan tidak pun sampai RM12.5 bilion.

Beliau turut mengumumkan 26 Mac depan akan diadakan satu majlis pelancaran Agenda Selangor Untuk Rakyat (ARUS) yang mempunyai banyak lagi program kebajikan kepada rakyat akan didedahkan

Abdul Khalid yang juga Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan PKR negeri berkata jumlah RM12.5 bilion itu bersangkut paut dengan isu Zon Bebas Pelabuhan Klang (PKFZ) yang kini sedang menjadi kes mahkamah melibatkan bekas dua menteri yang dikatakan menipu jemaah kabinet termasuk Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi dan Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

"Sebenarnya di Selangor ini kita telah banyak melakukan program untuk rakyat sebagai kebajikan kepada mereka meskipun tidak terdapat pun di dalam Buku Jingga bererti kita bukan hanya berjanji tetapi telah melaksanakannya.

"Sepanjang tiga tahun Pakatan mentadbir Kerajaan Negeri Selangor ini, selain dari tujuh perkara utama di dalam program Merakyatkan Ekonomi Selangor (MES), kita melakukan banyak perkara yang berkesan untuk rakyat negeri ini.

"Cumanya kita tidak mahu menyebutkan lebih banyak apa yang telah, sedang dan akan dibuat kerana ia hanya akan meningkatkan darah panas badan pemimpin BN," seloroh beliau sambil tersenyum disambut tepukan hadirin.

Abdul Khalid berkata demikian ketika berucap melancarkan Buku Jingga dan Sambutan Tiga Tahun Pentadbiran Pakatan Rakyat Negeri Selangor yang disambut sederhana di Stadium Malawati, malam semalam.

Turut berucap adalah Presiden PKR, Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Ismail, Timbalan Pengerusi DAP Kebangsaan, Dr Tan Seng Giaw dan Pesuruhjaya PAS negeri yang juga Exco Kerajaan Selangor, Datuk Dr Hasan Mohamad Ali.

Dalam isu sama, Abdul Khalid berkata, bila tidak berlaku rasuah dan kebocoran maka rakyat akan dapat manfaat yang banyak hasil daripada sistem pentadbiran yang sedang dilaksanakan oleh Kerajaan Selangor kini.


http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31235:pakatan-yakin-dapat-laksana-penuh-buku-jingga&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

Kickdefella: Melayu lemah, kesian dia

Kickdefella* 31072009

PARLIMEN Sheet1

Pilihanraya Umum ke 11 pada tahun 2004 menyaksikan Barisan Nasional menguasai 90.4% kerusi di Dewan Rakyat. Juaranya ialah UMNO walaupun tidak dapat mencatatkan rekod seratus peratus seperti beberapa parti komponen BN yang lain.

UMNO kecundang 7 kerusi kepada PAS dan juga 1 kerusi kepada Parti Keadilan (kini PKR). UMNO juga membantu parti-parti MCA, GERAKAN dan MIC menang dibeberapa kawasan majoriti Melayu dengan menumpaskan calon-calon Melayu daripada parti Pembangkang.

Kesan daripada tindakan UMNO ini, Kerajaan yang ditubuhkan dengan penguasaan lebih 90% di Dewan Rakyat itu hanyalah mengandungi 58.1% komposisi Melayunya. Manakala wakil rakyat bukan Melayu yang menang dibawah BN berjumlah 41.9%.

UMNO menang 109 kerusi didalam pilihanraya tersebut tetapi seorang wakil rakyatnya bukan dari keturunan Melayu.

Pilihanraya Umum ke 12 pada tahun 2008 menyaksikan prestasi terburuk BN dan juga UMNO. BN masih menubuhkan Kerajaan dengan kemenangan 140 buah kerusi tetapi keadaan semasa hari ini, kerusi BN di Parlimen adalah 137 bila UMNO kehilangan satu kerusi kepada PAS didalam pilihanraya kecil Parlimen Kuala Terengganu dan kehilangan 2 kerusi apabila SAPP bertindak meninggalkan BN beberapa bulan selepas PRU ke 12.

BN kini mempunyai 61.7% wakil rakyat di dalam Dewan Rakyat manakala 38.3% lagi merupakan gabungan wakil rakyat Pakatan Rakyat, SAPP dan Bebas yang menang di atas tiket PAS.

KOMPOSISI PARTI 2004

KOMPOSISI PARTI 2008

Ironinya, walaupun kerusi UMNO merosot sebanyak 31 kerusi tetapi dibantu dengan kerusi wakil Melayu dari PBB, BN hari menyaksikan peningkatan memberangsangkan penguasaan wakil rakyat Melayu berbanding dengan Bukan Melayu di dalam BN. Hari ini wakil rakyat Melayu adalah 62.8% iaitu peningkatan hampir 5%. Wakil Rakyat BN Bukan Melayu pula merosot dari 41.9% kepada 37.2%.

Wakil Rakyat Melayu dalam BN kini 35 orang lebih ramai dari wakil rakyat Bukan Melayu.

Mengapa UMNO mengatakan bahawa ketuanan Melayu didalam Kerajaan semakin merosot? Mengapa UMNO merasakan Melayu semakin lemah sedangkan orang Melayu yang peratusannya hanya 51% dari populasi rakyat Malaysia mempunyai suara hampir 63% dalam parti pemerintah.

Kita tinggalkan UMNO seketika kerana kita tentu yakin UMNO tidak buta statistik. Tetapi yang menggusarkan ialah mengapa beberapa pemimpin PAS seolah-olah rabun membaca statistik. Ini yang kita perlu risau.

MALAY GOV 2004

MALAY GOV 2008

Prestasi Pembangkang 2004 dan 2008

Pilihanraya Umum ke 11 menyaksikan PAS dan PKR kembali terdampar dipersada realiti politik Malaysia apabila kecermelangan mereka dalam pilihanraya 1999 berakhir dengan malang sekali.

PAS kehilangan Terengganu atau lebih enak disebut, Presiden PAS hilang jawatan Menteri Besarnya. Timbalan Presiden PAS juga hilang kerusi Parlimennya.

Di Kelantan, Mursyidul Am berjaya mempertahankan penguasaan PAS dengan berpaut kepada majoriti 2 kerusi sahaja. Lebih menggerunkan, dua kerusi mereka berpaut itupun kalau dicampur keseluruhan majoritinya tidak lebih daripada 50 undi.

Pada 2006, PAS Kelantan kehilangan lagi satu kerusi DUN menerusi pilihanraya kecil. Lantaran mereka mencatatkan rekod dunia sebagai kerajaan yang boleh bertahan paling lama dengan hanya majoriti 1 kerusi.

Di Parlimen, setelah persempadanan semula konstituensi pilihanraya di Semenanjung dan di Sabah pada tahun 2003 serta faktor ‘feel good’ Perdana Menteri baru Malaysia, peratusan wakil rakyat Pembangkang di dewan Rakyat menguncup kepada hanya 9.6%.

Daripada jumlah ini pula wakil rakyat Melayu dalam Pembangkang hanyalah 38.1% berbanding dengan 61.9% wakil rakyat Bukan Melayu.

Tetapi kedudukan semasa hari ini, Pembangkang menguasai 38.3% kerusi di Dewan Rakyat. Apa yang amat-amat signifikan ialah kedudukan wakil rakyat Melayu didalam pembangkang yang melonjak kepada 51.8% daripada 38.1% didalam tahun 2004. Wakil rakyat Bukan Melayu didalam Pembangkang pula ialah 48.2%.

MALAY OPPS 2004

MALAY OPPS 2008

Dalam erti kata lain, Melayu bukan sahaja mempunyai pengaruh yang besar didalam BN yang merupakan parti pemerintah, tetapi Melayu juga mempunyai pengaruh yang majoriti didalam Pembangkang.

Oleh itu apakah yang merisaukan orang-orang Melayu?

Apakah boleh dianggap Melayu berpecah semata-mata kerana satu pihak yang dulunya begitu dominan didalam politik Melayu kini sudah mula kehilangan taring?

Adakah kerana PKR dan PAS kini mempunyai jumlah wakil rakyat Melayu yang besar didalam gabungan Pembangkang maka itu tandanya Melayu berpecah?

Siapa Kata Hendak Selamatkan Melayu Sebenarnya Selamat UMNO

Sesetengah pihak bertungkus lumus membanting tulang mahu menyelamatkan Melayu. Persoalannya kenapa? Pengaruh Melayu terus hebat bahkan bertambah hebat. Melayu hari ini lebih dominan didalam BN dan begitu signifikan didalam Pembangkang. Kalau ada masanyanya Melayu ingin merasa bersyukur, inilah sebenar masa sebenarnya.

PAS dan PKR dilabelkan sebagai pengkhianat Melayu kerana bekerja sama dengan DAP. Tetapi apa yang peliknya, menerusi kerjasama dengan DAP, PAS dan PKR berjaya memperkasakan kedudukan Melayu di dalam Pembangkang.

Menerusi kerjasama dengan DAP, PAS dan PKR berjaya merampas sekurang-kurangnya 5 kerusi Parlimen daripada MCA, MIC dan Gerakan. Ini bererti lebih 5 wakil rakyat Melayu didalam Parlimen.

Semenjak pilihanraya 1955, UMNO mengajar orang Melayu memberikan kerusi majoriti Melayu kepada wakil rakyat Bukan Melayu. Sebab itulah berkali-kali pilihanraya pengundi-pengundi Melayu memberikan undi kepada MCA, MIC dan Gerakan walaupun mereka ini ditentang oleh calon Melayu dari PAS dan lain-lain parti.

OVERALL 2004

OVERALL 2008

Perjuangan Malaysia Dapat Memperkasakan Melayu

Ketidakseimbangan kekuatan Melayu dianggap sebagai satu masalah besar didalam gabungan Pakatan Rakyat. Ia menimbulkan ketidakselesaan orang-orang Melayu.

Ketidakseimbangan ini sebenarnya hanyalah ciptaan UMNO. Pakatan Rakyat berjaya menimbulkan keseimbangan itu.

Hari ini representasi Melayu didalam Kerajaan dan Pembangkang adalah refleksi sebenar populasi Malaysia. Lebih unik lagi keseimbangan itu dicapai bukan atas dasar perjuangan bersikap perkauman tetapi perjuangan berteraskan keadilan untuk semua kaum yang dibawa oleh Pakatan Rakyat.

Pakatan Rakyat sudah memperjuangkan formula untuk Malaysia yang sejahtera buat semua dan ia telah terbukti berjaya. Dan ia berjaya tanpa perlu slogan atau laungan atau kempen seperti 1 Malaysia. Ia berjaya kerana keikhlasan untuk memakmurkan negara ini untuk semua rakyatnya.

* Tulisan Kickdefella ini disiarkan beliau pada 31 Julai 2009 lalu melalui blognya. Apakah dia mempunyai pandangan yang sama sekarang mengenai isu ini, tidak dapat dipastikan - Editor


http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31237:kickdefella-melayu-lemah-kesian-dia&catid=96:fokus-khas&Itemid=134

Penganalisis: BN tak sepatutnya rasa selesa



Mac 7, 11 12:22pm

Kemenangan berganda BN di Merlimau dan Kerdau boleh dijadikan penanda aras sokongan rakyat, namun parti itu harus mengambil iktibar daripada tsunami politik yang diharunginya pada pilihan raya umum 2008, kata penganalisis politik, Datuk Dr Zainal Kling.

"Ini kerana sokongan sokongan pengundi di kawasan bandar masih belum dapat dipastikan, namun kini sudah ada tanda-tanda sokongan rakyat mula kembali kepada BN," katanya ketika mengulas kemenangan BN itu.

Dengan dua kemenangan hari ini, BN menangi lapan daripada 16 pilihan raya kecil yang diadakan sejak pilihan raya umum 2008.

Sebelum ini, BN menang pilihan raya kecil Parlimen Batu Sapi, DUN Galas, DUN Tenang, DUn Bagan Pinang, DUN Batang Ai dan parlimen Hulu Selangor.

Dr Zainal berkata, kemenangan calon BN di Merlimau dan Kerdau dengan majoriti yang besar semalam, dilihat mencerminkan kembalinya 'mood' sokongan dan keyakinan rakyat kepada BN.

Katanya, beliau yakin dengan usaha keras kerajaan di bawah kepimpinan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak yang mewujudkan pelbagai dasar terutama Pelan Transformasi Kerajaan (GTP), Pelan Transformasi Ekonomi (ETP), Bidang Keberhasilan Utama Negara (NKRA), BN akan diterima baik oleh
rakyat, tambah mengukuhkan kembali sokongan terhadap BN.

"Apa yang perlu dilakukan oleh kerajaan BN ialah melipatgandakan usaha bagi mengekal momentum yang sedia ada, kerana pakatan pembangkang sentiasa merangka dan mewujudkan pelan pembangunan dan agenda tersendiri bagi menarik minat rakyat," katanya.

Timbalan Naib Canselor INTI International University Prof Datuk Dr Ibrahim Ahmad Bajunid pula berkata dengan kemenangan berganda ini, BN tidak sepatutnya merasakan mereka di dalam keadaan selesa kerana sejarah membuktikan bahawa kesilapan yang kecil, baik dari individu mahupun parti, mampu menimbulkan 'turn-over' sehingga membawa kepada tsunami politik seperti pilihan raya umum 2008.

Bagaimanapun menurutnya BN kini berada di atas landasan yang betul dalam menghadapi pilihan raya umum akan datang.

azlanSementara itu Pensyarah Kolej Undang-Undang, Kerajaan dan Pengajian Antarabangsa, Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Mohamad Faisol Keling pula berpendapat tsunami politik kini dilihat melanda pembangkang pula apabila sejak akhir-akhir ini mereka sering berhadapan dengan kekalahan.

"Mereka kini dilihat berturut-turut menghadapi kekalahan bermula dengan pilihan raya kecil DUN Galas pada 4 November lepas, diikuti dengan pilihan raya kecil DUN Tenang pada 30 Januari lepas dan kini di Merlimau dan Kerdau," katanya.

Beliau berkata ini membuktikan rakyat tidak lagi menerima ideologi PKR-DAP-PAS yang sering berubah-ubah untuk kepentingan segelintir individu dan parti.

"Ini yang jadi ukuran kepada masyarakat, di mana nilai perjuangan PAS diburukkan apabila PAS berkongsi kuasa dengan DAP dan PKR, dan secara tidak langsung menunjukkan PAS langsung tidak konsisten dalam dasar perjuangan mereka.

"Orang lebih yakin dengan dasar BN yang konsisten, yang berlainan dengan dasar pakatan pembangkang yang hanya berkisar kepada kepentingan parti atau individu sehingga mengakibatkan mereka kehilangan sokongan pengundi yang pernah menaikkan mereka pada PRU 2008 dahulu," katanya.

Mohamad Faisol turut berpendapat, kemenangan di Merlimau dan Kerdau ini turut memperlihatkan kembalinya sokongan pengundi di atas pagar terutamanya pengundi muda.

Dalam pilihan raya kecil DUN Merlimau, calon BN Roslan Ahmad menewaskan Yuhaizad Abdullah dari PAS dengan majoriti 3,643 undi, manakala di DUN Kerdau, PAS turut menerima tamparan hebat apabila calonnya Hassanuddin Salim tewas kepada calon BN Syed Ibrahim Syed Ahmad dengan majoriti 2,724 undi.

- Bernama


http://malaysiakini.com/news/157922

Kedah mula hantar pulang pelajar Mesir

Khairul Izwan

ALOR SETAR, 7 Mac: Menteri Besar Kedah, Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak berpuas hati dengan proses penghantaran pulang pelajar Kedah ke negara Mesir yang di uruskan oleh Yayasan Islam Negeri Kedah.

Ustaz Azizan telah bersama-sama dengan pelajar dan keluarga masing-masing di depan Wisma Darul Aman untuk meninjau pelepasan kumpulan pertama pelajar ke Mesir kelmarin.

“Setakat hari pertama proses penghantaran pelajar, saya berpuas hati kerana tidak ada yang tercicir dan saya harap perjalanan tidak tergendala,” katanya.

“Ada pelajar yang tidak sedar pasport mereka tamat tempoh, disebabkan itu kita ambil masa untuk memperbaharui pasport dan mohon visa. Mereka yang lewat memperoleh visa akan menaiki penerbangan akhir, bagaimana pun semuanya kini dalam proses dan tidak akan jejaskan perancangan asal,” katanya.

Turut hadir untuk meninjau pelepasan kumpulan pertama itu ialah Exco Agama, Pelajaran Dan Koperasi, Datuk Mohamed Taulan Mat Rasul.

Menurutnya, Yayasan Islam Negeri Kedah sedang memantau dan menguruskan segala persiapan dan proses penghantaran bermula dari Wisma Darul Aman hingga ke KLIA, dan seterusnya tiba ke Mesir.

Kerajaan Negeri Kedah telah menyewa 3 buah kapal terbang Egypt Air untuk proses menghantar pulang 835 pelajar Kedah ke Mesir serta memberikan wang saku RM500 setiap pelajar.

Kumpulan pertama yang dilepaskan ialah seramai 235 pelajar serta 9 pegawai bertolak dari Alor Setar ke KLIA dengan enam buah bas yang disediakan.

Penerbangan kedua akan dilepaskan pada 8 Mac dan penerbangan seterusnya 10 Mac.


Kerajaan Negeri Kedah memperuntukkan kira-kira RM2.5 juta dalam projek penghantaan pelajar Kedah kembali ke Mesir dan projek ini di uruskan oleh Yayasan Islam Negeri Kedah.


http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31234:kedah-mula-hantar-pulang-pelajar-mesir&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

Kerdau p'raya 'paling melampau', kata Tuan Ibrahim

Mac 6, 11 9:31pm

Naib Presiden PAS Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man mendakwa, parti itu tewas dalam pilihan raya kecil DUN Kerdau disebabkan peningkatan jumlah para pemilih.

"Bagaimanapun daripada sudut jumlah undi di tiga kawasan Felda, ada peningkatan," katanya dalam sidang media di markaz PAS di Kerdau malam ini selepas keputusan rasmi diumumkan.

Ditanya sama ada keputusan hari ini menunjukkan PAS kehilangan undi Melayu, Tuan Ibrahim menafikannya kerana Kerdau merupakan kubu kuat BN.

azlan"Dengan segala jenteranya, agak sukar bagi kita. Bagi saya ini cuma kemerosotan kecil," katanya lagi.

Tuan Ibrahim juga terus menyatakan perasaan tidak puas hati kepada perjalanan proses pilihan raya kali ini sebagai "pilihan raya paling melampau".

Justeru, tambahnya, PAS akan menyarankan supaya dilakukan reformasi melalui program pemutihan pilihan raya Bersih 2.0.

Dalam pada itu, Tuan Ibrahim turut menafikan dakwaan Pakatan gagal menterjemahkan kandungan Buku Jingga dalam pilihan raya kali ini.

Beliau memberi alasan, pilihan raya Kerdau lebih tertumpu kepada isu tempatan.

Sementara itu, exco kerajaan tempatan Selangor Ronnie Liu pula berkata Pakatan tidak perlu susah hati kerana ujian sebenar adalah dalam pilihan raya umum.

Ditanya tentang sokongan undi Cina di Kerdau kali ini, Ronnie berkata perkara itu tidak dapat diukur kerana bercampur dengan kaum lain dalam satu daerah mengundi.

Calon BN Syed Ibrahim Syed Ahmad memperolehi kemenangan besar dengan majoriti 2,724 undi, menewaskan Hassanuddin yang mendapat 2,336 undi.

Keputusan pilihan raya kecil itu diumumkan oleh pegawai pengurus pilihan raya, Datuk Tarif Abdul Rahman kira-kira 8.20 malam ini.

Majoriti kemenangan BN itu menunjukkan parti itu berjaya mengembalikan tahap sokongan yang dinikmatinya pada pilihan raya umum 2004 di mana parti itu mendapat majoriti sebanyak 2,565 undi.

Ia juga menunjukkan pertambahan hampir 70 peratus berbanding majoriti yang diperolehi BN sebanyak 1,615 undi pada 2008.

Pilihan raya kecil itu turut mencatatkan jumlah keluar mengundi sebanyak 83 peratus atau 7,480 orang pemilih keluar mengundi selepas semua 13 pusat mengundi ditutup 5 petang tadi.


http://malaysiakini.com/news/157903

Premis judi: PAS bawa kepada pimpinan Pakatan

Mac 6, 11 12:14pm

Setiausaha agung PAS, Datuk Mustafa Ali menegaskan hari ini bahawa sudah menjadi polisi kerajaan negeri Kelantan sejak 20 tahun lalu untuk menentang sebarang bentuk perjudian.

"Bagi saya, isu ini perlu dilihat dalam ruang lingkup yang lebih luas dan tidak terbatas kepada Islam dan bukan Islam atau Melayu dan bukan Melayu sahaja," katanya dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.

NONEBeliau mengulas berkaitan dengan tindakan kerajaan negeri Kelantan yang mengambil tindakan terhadap premis yang menjual tiket perjudian di Kelantan, dan berkaitan kenyataan pengerusi DAP, Karpal Singh, dan yang lain-lain mengenainya.

Mengulas lanjut, Mustafa berkata: "Apa yang perlu dilihat adalah kesan buruk daripada perjudian.

"Pada saya ia ditolak semua agama dan oleh prinsip kemanusiaan untuk wujudkan keluarga, masyarakat dan negara yang baik," tambahnya.

Mustafa berkata, oleh kerana isu tersebut melibatkan prinsip dan dasar, maka beliau akan membawa perkara itu kepada pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat untuk dibincang secara serius dan menyelesaikan masalah itu dengan baik.

"Kita tahu, sikap Umno dan BN menghalalkan judi sebab itu lesen-lesen perjudian di keluarkan oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan.

"Kita mahu Pakatan Rakyat mempunyai sikap yang tegas dan berbeza dengan BN dalam hal ini," tambahnya.


http://malaysiakini.com/news/157845

Judi: PAS bawa ke mesyuarat Pakatan

Harakahdaily

KUALA LUMPUR, 6 Mac: PAS akan membawa isu perjudian di negara ini ke mesyuarat pimpinan tertinggi Pakatan Rakyat untuk diselesaikan dengan baik.

Setiausaha Agung PAS, Datuk Mustafa Ali (gambar) dalam kenyataannya berkata, PAS tahu, sikap Umno dan BN menghalalkan judi sebab itu lesen-lesen perjudian di keluarkan oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan.

"Kita mahu Pakatan Rakyat mempunyai sikap yang tegas dan berbeza dengan BN dalam hal ini," kata beliau dalam kenyataannya itu.

Baru-baru ini, kerajaan negeri Kelantan telah mengambil tindakan terhadap premis yang menjual tiket-tiket perjudian di Kelantan.

Ekoran itu, beberapa kenyataan dikeluarkan oleh pemimpin DAP dan yang terakhir adalah kenyataan Karpal Singh, pengerusi DAP semalam yang mempertikaikan tindakan Kelantan itu.

"Suka saya maklumkan di sini, menjadi polisi kerajaan negeri Kelantan sejak 20 tahun lalu untuk menentang sebarang bentuk perjudian.

"Bagi saya, isu ini perlu dilihat dalam ruang lingkup yang lebih luas dan tidak terbatas kepada Islam dan bukan Islam atau Melayu dan bukan Melayu sahaja.

"Apa yang perlu dilihat adalah kesan buruk daripada perjudian. Pada saya ia ditolak semua agama dan oleh prinsip kemanusiaan untuk wujudkan keluarga, masyarakat dan negara yang baik," kata beliau dalam kenyataannya itu.


http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31232:judi-pas-bawa-ke-mesyuarat-pakatan&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

Pelajar patah tangan dibelasah rakan sekolah

Mac 6, 11 8:31pm

Seorang pelajar tingkatan tiga sebuah sekolah menengah di Simpang Empat, dekat sini, patah tangan kiri akibat dibelasah rakan sekolahnya pada Jumaat lalu.

Dalam kejadian kira-kira 11 pagi itu, Muhamad Shahfaly Anoar, 15, patah lengan kiri, tulang bahu kiri terkehel dan luka di pipi kiri akibat dibelasah tiga pelajar dan dua daripada mereka adalah rakan sekelasnya.


Menceritakan kejadian itu, pelajar itu berkata dia sedang mengikuti kelas Kemahiran Hidup apabila ditarik keluar oleh seorang pelajar dan membawanya kepada 10 pelajar lain yang menunggu di bahagian bawah bangunan sekolah.

Bagaimanapun, katanya hanya tiga daripada mereka yang bertindak memukulnya.

"Saya hanya mampu menahan kesakitan dan setelah dipukul ada rakan membantu membawa saya masuk ke kelas," katanya ketika ditemui di rumahnya di Kampung Simpang Empat Syed Kassim hari ini.

Katanya namun dia tidak memberitahu guru kelas mengenai kejadian itu apabila masuk semula ke dalam kelas.

Muhamad Shahfaly berkata dia percaya motif dirinya dipukul disebabkan dendam kerana selaku ketua tingkatan dia sering melaporkan kepada guru mengenai masalah disiplin pelajar kelasnya.

Bapa pelajar itu, Anoar Ahmad, 38, berkata beliau terkejut melihat keadaan anaknya yang sedang menahan kesakitan semasa menjemputnya kira-kira pukul 12 tengah hari.

Katanya beliau kemudian terus memaklumkan kepada pihak sekolah dan membuat laporan di Balai Polis Simpang Empat pukul 7.30 malam.

"Saya membawa anak saya ke Hospital Tuanku Fauziah (HTF) untuk menerima rawatan dan hasil pemeriksaan mendapati lengan kiri anak saya patah," katanya.

Muhamad Shahfaly menerima rawatan di HTF selama satu hari dan dibenarkan keluar pada Sabtu dan diberi cuti sakit selama 11 hari.

Katanya itu merupakan kali kedua anaknya dibelasah oleh pelajar sekolah itu, dan kali pertama pada tahun lepas tetapi anaknya tidak mengalami kecederaan serius.

"Saya berasa terkilan dan tidak berpuas hati dengan pentadbiran sekolah dan guru harus bertanggungjawab ke atas kejadian," katanya yang mahu menukarkan anaknya ke sekolah lain.

Sementara itu, Ketua Polis Daerah Kangar, Supt Abdul Rahman Noordin ketika dihubungi berkata polis sudah menahan reman empat pelajar bagi membantu siasatan kes itu.

- Bernama


http://malaysiakini.com/news/157896

Kenapa Anwar berada di kandang tertuduh?

Harakahdaily

KUALA LUMPUR, 6 Mac: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim duduk di dalam kandang tertuduh setiap hari kini adalah kerana beliau sedang berusaha untuk membuat perubahan asas dalam sistem pentadbiran negara ini, kata Naib Presiden PKR, N Surendran.

Surendran yang juga seorang peguam dalam kenyataannya berkata, perubahan ini semestinya menghakis pengaruh kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN) dan pastinya akan menyingkirkan BN dari kekuasaan.

Atas dasar itulah, katanya, Umno dan BN akan berusaha untuk menyekat usaha yang dibuat Anwar itu dengan pelbagai cara termasuk mendakwanya dengan pelbagai kes.


Bagi beliau, pemimpin dan kerajaan BN sememangnya tidak peduli tentang kewajaran perubahan ini yang memberi manfaat kepada rakyat.

"Apa yang mereka pentingkan adalah kelangsungan politik mereka sahaja. Selain hanya obsesi ke atas kelangsungan ini, mereka juga mengabaikan perkara-perkara yang memberikan manfaat kepada negara," kata beliau dalam kenyataan itu.

Bagi Surendran, reformasi yang dibawa oleh Anwar akan menghapuskan ketidakcekapan pengurusan ekonomi dan pembaziran yang diakibatkan dari gejala rasuah dan kronisme; bebas dari kawalan institusi politik yang sepatutnya bersifat bebas; dan mengembalikan kebebasan politik kepada rakyat yang dirampas oleh kerajaan BN selama lebih 50 tahun.

Struktur, imperatif dan para personaliti BN membuatkan ianya mustahil bagi mereka untuk melaksanakan perubahan dan memulihkan diri mereka.

Maka mereka mengetatkan cengkaman ke atas negara yang sedang bergelut untuk bergerak ke depan menuju kebebasan dan kemakmuran untuk semua, dan menggunakan cara tertentu untuk melumpuhkan sesiapa yang berjuang untuk mengembalikan kuasa kepada rakyat.

"Maka setiap hari Anwar didudukkan di dalam kandang tertuduh, dan nasib negara digantung tanpa taliti," tegas beliau.

Bagi Surendran, adalah sesuatu yang tidak asing lagi buat rejim yang zalim untuk merencana pendakwaan fitnah terhadap musuh-musuh politik mereka.

Dalam tahun 1930-an, Stalin merancang beberapa siri perbicaraan yang menyaksikan penyingkiran semua yang mengancam kekuasaan beliau.

Pada 1995, Ken Saro Wiwa, seorang tokoh pengkritik yang dihormati di dalam kerajaan Nigeria telah didakwa dengan pertuduhan rekaan oleh tribunal tentera dan dijatuhi hukuman mati walaupun dikecam masyarakat antarabangsa.

Pada 2009, ikon demokrasi Burma, Aung San Suu Kyi telah dijatuhi hukuman tiga tahun penjara dengan kerja berat selepas didakwa dalam perbicaraan palsu atas pertuduhan tidak masuk akal iaitu mengingkari perintah tahanan rumah.


Dengan mencontohi tindakan-tindakan ini, Kerajaan BN mendakwa Anwar Ibrahim, katanya.

Rakyat pula, kata belkiau, cuba diperbodohkan dengan perbicaraan ini yang dibalut dan disamarkan secara formal dengan perendahan undang-undang.

"Sebagai ketua pendakwaan, Pejabat Peguam Negara mestilah berubah secara komprehensif, dan kuasanya yang besar mesti dikaji," tambahnya.

Pihak tertinggi polis dan kerajaan mestilah bertanggungjawab terhadap pencabulan perundangan awam dan pembaziran wang rakyat akibat dari perbicaraan ini.

Bagi beliau, tiada negara yang bergelut atas nama Kebebasan boleh ditekan sebegitu lama.

"Jalannya mungkin panjang dan sukar, namun saya menyeru setiap rakyat negara bertuah ini agar melihat semua ini. Kita berhutang dengan diri sendiri dan generasi akan datang," tambah beliau.


http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31231:kenapa-anwar-berada-di-kandang-tertuduh&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

Program tiga tahun Pakatan S'gor tumpu agenda rakyat

Salhan K Ahmad
Mac 6, 11
3:40pm

Setiausaha kerajaan negeri Datuk Mohammed Khusrin Munawi hadir ke majlis sambutan tiga tahun pentadbiran Pakatan Rakyat Selangor pada malam tadi dengan wajah yang tenang.

Bekas pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam yang kelihatan segak dengan mengenakan baju batik itu ditempatkan di tempat duduk utama di atas pentas majlis berkenaan.

Malah beliau turut bersama-sama pemimpin Pakatan yang lain untuk menyempurnakan satu gimik pelancaran dalam majlis yang sama.

NONEGimik berkenaan adalah bagi pelancaran risalah 'buku jingga' Pakatan yang menggariskan program-program yang akan dijalankan dalam masa 100 hari sekiranya berjaya membentuk kerajaan persekutuan selepas ini.

Sebaik saja menteri besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim selesai memberikan ucapan, beliau turut bangun dan bersalaman dengan Khalid sambil bibirnya menguntumkan senyuman.

Namun, ketika Khalid sedang menyudahkan ucapannya sebelum itu, wajah Mohammed Khusrin ternyata serius.

Khalid menamatkan ucapan beliau itu dengan rayuan kepada para penjawat awam serta para pemimpin yang dilantik dalam pentadbiran negeri Selangor supaya "lebih memahami kemahuan rakyat Selangor."

"Sekarang bukan rakyat yang kena minta, tapi kerajaan yang kena bagi. Rakyat yang menjadi tuan kepada pentadbiran kita," kata Khalid dalam ucapannya.

selangor government launch orange book 060311 khalidDalam ucapan itu, Khalid turut mengumumkan bahawa kerajaan negeri itu akan melancarkan program tiga tahun untuk pembangunan Selangor dalam satu rancangan yang dinamakan Agenda Selangor Untuk Rakyat.

Program yang akan dilancarkan pada 26 Mac itu merupakan rangka kepada semua aspek pembangunan yang akan dijalankan di Selangor, kata Khalid.

Dalam program berkenaan, tumpuan akan diberikan ke atas usaha untuk menyelamatkan khazanah Selangor seperti melalui hasil air, galian dan juga hasil melalui syarikat-syarikat berkaitan kerajaan negeri, katanya lagi.

Tempoh 1,000 hari atau tiga tahun sebelum ini telah membolehkan kerajaan negeri mengenalpasti "kebocoran" melalui hutang yang tidak dikutip oleh kerajaan negeri sebelum ini.

Melalui usaha yang dijalankan, kerajaan negeri telah berjaya mendapatkan semula RM392 juta daripada jumlah yang tidak dikutip itu.

"Kita tidak ambil duit kerajaan Selangor atau persekutuan tapi dari perkara yang dulunya bocor dan tidak dikutip, kita ambil dan beri kepada rakyat. Inilah yang dikatakan hasil negeri untuk rakyat

"Duit itu kita telah mula gunakan, contohnya RM20 juta yang diperuntukkan dan dilancarkan untuk masyarakat miskin di bandar," katanya lagi disambut tepukan pada majlis itu.

Katanya lagi, kerajaan negeri juga telah mengenalpasti aset air milik rakyat bernilai lebih RM10.9 bilion.

selangor government launch orange book shah alam 060311 1Kini, kerajaan negeri sedang berusaha untuk menjadikan pentadbiran air itu dibuat secara telus, tertib dan menguntungkan rakyat, kata Khalid.

Tambahnya, kerajaan negeri juga berjaya mendapatkan semula hasil daripada perlombongan pasir berjumlah RM50 juta melalui syarikat Kumpulan Semesta Sdn Bhd.


Turut berucap di majlis itu ialah ahli parlimen Kepong Dr Tan Seng Giaw mewakili DAP dan juga presiden PKR Datuk Seri Wan Azizah Ismail.

Pesuruhjaya PAS negeri dan juga exco hal ehwal agama Islamnya Datuk Hasan Ali turut menyampaikan ucapannya di majlis berkenaan.

Sambutan tiga tahun pentadbiran kerajaan negeri Pakatan Rakyat Selangor itu diadakan selama dua hari di Stadium Malawati di Shah Alam yang berakhir hari ini.

Antara acara lain sepanjang dua hari program tersebut ialah pertandingan futsal, go-kart, persembahan kesenian, pameran, pertandingan memasak dan pertanding mewarna untuk kanak-kanak.


http://malaysiakini.com/news/157864

Fitnah: Tuan Ibrahim saman Utusan, TV3

Harakahdaily

TEMERLOH, 6 Mac: Naib Presiden PAS, Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man (gambar) akan memfailkan saman terhadap akhbar Utusan Malaysia dan TV3 kerana didakwa memfitnah beliau membeli tanah peneroka Felda yang sebenarnya dibeli oleh pihak lain.

Berdasarkan laporan blog-blog Umno, semalam Utusan menyiarkan tiga artikel berturut-turut yang menuduh Tuan Ibrahim mengambil kesempatan daripada peneroka tanah rancangan yang kesempitan hidup dengan membeli tanah mereka.

Malah Utusan turut menuduh disebabkan pembelian tersebut, tuan tanah asal tersebut kini hidup dalam serba kedaifan.

Pertuduhan terhadap Tuan Ibrahim turut dilaporkan Buletin Utama di TV3 pada sebelah malamnya walaupun selepas pembeli sebenar tanah tersebut, Ibrahim Osman membuat pendedahan sebenar dalam satu sidang akhbar di markas induk PAS Kerdau dengan menafikan perkara tersebut.

"Saya sangat dukacita dengan tuduhan itu kerana hasrat beliau untuk membantu saya dan peneroka berkenaan telah bertukar menjadi satu fitnah terhadap beliau.

"Hasil dari jualan tanah Felda tersebut, peneroka berkenaan telah berjaya membangunkan 15 ekar ladang sawit dan juga ternakan kambing dan lembu, bukannya menjadi dhaif sebagaimana didakwa," kata Ibrahim Osman dalam sidang media khas di Markas PAS Kerdau lewat petang semalam.

(Gambar: Ibrahim Osman menunjukkan bukti bahawa tanah itu adalah milik beliau melalui syarikatnya)

"Sebenarnya apa yang berlaku adalah, seorang peneroka Felda telah mengiklan di merata-rata tempat mahu menjual tanahnya. Beliau juga telah menemui saya dan meminta saya membelinya.

"Memandangkan saya tidak ada duit, saya telah bertanya kepada Datuk Tuan Ibrahim untuk membantu saya. Dia bersetuju meminjamkan dahulu duit kepada saya dan sebagai jaminan terhadap pinjaman tersebut saya bersetuju menggunakan nama isteri beliau sementara saya
menjelaskan kesemua pinjaman itu.

"Apabila saya mempunyai duit, saya telah mengambilalih tanah itu dan menggunakannya untuk dicagarkannya kepada pihak Mara atas nama syarikat saya, Syarikat Pintar Kesuma Sdn Bhd,” katanya sambil menambah bahawa soal Datuk Tuan Ibrahim membeli tanah Felda sehingga menganiaya peneroka Felda tidak berbangkit sama sekali dan satu dakwaan dan tuduhan yang tidak benar.

Dalam pada itu, Tuan Ibrahim yang juga Pesuruhjaya PAS Pahang dalam sidang media itu berkata, beliau tidak mempunyai apa-apa kaitan dengan isu ini dan hanya membantu meminjamkan wang kepada Ibrahim sahaja.

"Media dan Umno hanya cuba mengalih isu sebenar di Kerdau iaitu masalah hutang kerajaan negeri dengan membangkitkan perkara yang tidak benar ini," katanya.

Harakahdaily difahamkan Tuan Ibrahim akan berbincang dengan peguamnya untuk memfailkan saman terhadap Utusan Malaysia dan TV3 serta beberapa pihak lain dalam masa terdekat.

LAPORAN SEBELUM INI

Umno habis isu, serang pengarah pilihan raya

Umno dan medianya menipu - pembeli tanah


http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31229:fitnah-tuan-ibrahim-saman-utusan-tv3-&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

MBBS tak lulus lesen iklan berunsur seks, tahyul

Mac 6, 11 3:19pm

Majlis Bandaraya Shah Alam (MBSA) tidak akan berkompromi dengan sebarang iklan produk dan perkhidmatan yang berunsurkan seks serta tahyul di semua kawasan pentadbiran pihak berkuasa tempatan (PBT) itu, kata Datuk Bandar Shah Alam Datuk Mazalan Md Noor.

Beliau berkata sebarang permohonan untuk mengiklankan produk atau perkhidmatan sedemikian tidak akan diterima kerana ia hanya akan memperdaya pengguna selain tidak mempunyai jaminan daripada mana-mana pihak yang sepatutnya.

"Kami menerima banyak aduan mengenai iklan kurang menyenangkan yang ditampal dan digantung pada tiang lampu, pokok atau pondok telefon di sekitar kawasan Shah Alam. Justeru langkah drastik telah diambil dengan menurunkan serta melupuskannya," katanya kepada Bernama hari ini.

Tinjauan di beberapa kawasan di sekitar Shah Alam mendapati beberapa bunting iklan yang ditampal pada tiang lampu dan pokok menawarkan perkhidmatan urut batin, ubat tenaga batin serta bantuan secara halus bagi mengutip hutang.

Kesemua iklan berkenaan tidak mempunyai pelekat pengesahan daripada MBSA seperti sepatutnya dan ditulis dalam pelbagai bahasa serta turut memaparkan nombor telefon untuk dihubungi selain ilustrasi yang mempunyai maksud tersirat, misalnya pisang.

Mazalan berkata mereka yang mahu mengiklankan produk atau perkhidmatan di kawasan MBSA perlu memohon lesen dan pelekat kebenaran di Jabatan Perlesenan dan Penjaja Wisma MBSA di sini serta mematuhi syarat yang ditetapkan.

Beliau berkata antara syarat yang ditetapkan ialah saiz bunting mestilah 0.6 meter lebar dan 1.82 meter panjang manakala bagi kain rentang pula 4.2 meter lebar dan 6.1 meter panjang.

"Bahasa yang digunakan juga perlu jelas, sopan serta mengikut ejaan yang betul serta dipasang pada tempat yang tidak mengganggu lalu lintas atau boleh mendatangkan bahaya.

"Soft copy atau contoh bunting dan kain rentang juga perlu dibawa bersama bagi proses kelulusan pelekat kebenaran daripada MBSA," katanya.

Mazalan berkata setiap iklan juga diberi tempoh dua minggu hingga sebulan untuk dipaparkan dan perlu ditanggalkan sebaik tamat tempoh.

Bermula hujung Mac ini, operasi bersepadu antara penguat kuasa MBSA dan kontraktor yang dilantik akan dilakukan untuk menurunkan semua iklan yang tidak mempunyai pelekat kelulusan daripada MBSA dan iklan yang telah tamat tempoh.

"Kita juga akan turunkan semua iklan yang diletakkan di tempat yang tidak sesuai walaupun mempunyai pelekat daripada MBSA selain iklan-iklan yang mempunyai unsur-unsur lucah atau tahyul di semua kawasan MBSA," katanya.

Dalam pada itu, Mazalan berkata mereka yang ingin membuat aduan mengenai hal berkaitan iklan di kawasan MBSA boleh menghubungi talian 03-55105133 sambungan 254 (bahagian aduan awam) ketika waktu pejabat atau bilik gerakan MBSA 03-55105811 yang beroperasi 24 jam.

- Bernama

http://malaysiakini.com/news/157862

SPR takrifkan rasuah, guna premis awam

Jimadie Shah Othman
Mac 5, 11
7:27pm

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (Malaysia) menjelaskan, dakwaan berlaku penggunaan premis awam dalam pilihan raya kecil Kerdau seperti didakwa PAS mungkin disebabkan salah tanggap semata-mata.

Timbalan Pengarah SPR Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar berkata, jika sesebuah parti hanya mendirikan khemah di sebelah premis awam dan menggunakan kemudahan berdekatan tempat itu, ia tidak boleh dikatakan kesalahan.

"Jadi inilah yang saya agak mereka anggap BN menggunakan premis awam," katanya.

Naib Presiden PAS Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man pagi tadi menyenaraikan penggunaan premis awam dan dan pengumuman peruntukan dan projek oleh pemimpin BN di Kerdau yang didakwanya melanggar Akta Kesalahan (Perjalanan) Pilihan Raya 1954.

Tuan Ibrahim yang juga pengarah pilihan raya PAS Kerdau menyatakan kekesalannya terhadap pelbagai pihak berkuasa, termasuk SPR tetapi tiada sebarang tindakan diambil.

Premis yang didakwa terlibat antaranya padang awam Teluk Sentang, masjid dan sekolah Kebangsaan Batu Sawar serta dewan prang ramai Felda Jengka 23.

Manakala antara yang didakwa boleh ditakrifkan sebagai rasuah pula antaranya bayaran wang SES berjumlah RM13,000 seorang peneroka atau sebanyak RM3,367,558.00 kepada peneroka Felda Jengka 22 pada 7 Mac.

Bercakap dalam sidang media di Temerloh petang ini, Wan Ahmad berkata, pihaknya akan memastikan perkara itu tidak berlaku esok dan akan bercakap sekali lagi dengan pucuk pimpinan parti terlibat.

Sementara itu, ditanya tentang pengumuman projek dan peruntukan sepanjang pilihan raya kecil DUN itu, Wan Ahmad menjelaskan rasuah menurut akta kesalahan pilihan raya merujuk kepada pembelian undi "daripada calon kepada pengundi".

"Kalau melibatkan yang di depan sana pelbagai manusia, (itu) bukan semua pengundi," katanya sambil menyerahkan perkara itu sebagai Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM).


http://malaysiakini.com/news/157824
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...